doc: R Abnormal Psychology/Assessment of Mental Health Problems.md Abnormal Psychology/Causes of Abnormal Behavior.md Abnormal Psychology/Historical and Contemporary Views of Abnormal Behavior.md Abnormal Psychology/Introduction to Abnormal Psychology.md Abnormal Psychology/Stress.md Social Psychology/Aggression.md Social Psychology/Altruism.md Social Psychology/Attitudes.md Social Psychology/Behaviors in Group.md Social Psychology/Chinese Social Psychology.md Social Psychology/Compliance, Conformity, and Obedience.md Social Psychology/Interpersonal Attraction.md Social Psychology/Introduction & Research Methods.md Social Psychology/Persuasion.md Social Psychology/Prejudice.md Social Psychology/Social Cognition.md Social Psychology/Social perception.md, M BSc(Hons) Psychology/PSYC11411 Individual Differences in Mental Health and Wellbeing/Week 2.md
182 lines
5.4 KiB
Markdown
182 lines
5.4 KiB
Markdown
---
|
||
Course: PSYG2500 Abnormal Psychology
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## 1. Introduction to Basic Elements in Assessment
|
||
|
||
Interaction of **Importance of trust and rapport** and **Impact on assessment** process.
|
||
|
||
### 1.1. Identification of presenting problem
|
||
|
||
- Situational or pervasive?
|
||
- Duration?
|
||
- Prior attempts to help or treat?
|
||
- Self-defeating or resourceful?
|
||
- How does problem impact social roles?
|
||
- Does problem match any DSM-5 disorder criteria?
|
||
|
||
### 1.2. Advantage of classification of presenting problem
|
||
|
||
- Treatment planning
|
||
- Knowledge of range of diagnostic problems
|
||
- Insurance payment
|
||
|
||
### 1.3. Good assessment includes
|
||
|
||
- social history noting:
|
||
- Personality factors
|
||
- Social context
|
||
- various professional orientations:
|
||
- May determine assessment techniques
|
||
- Does not limit clinician to one type of assessment
|
||
|
||
### 1.4. Dynamic formulation
|
||
|
||
Describes the current situation but also includes hypotheses about what is driving the person to behave in maladaptive ways.
|
||
|
||
- Hypotheses about future behavior are derived.
|
||
- Decisions about treatment are made collaboratively with the consent and approval of the individual.
|
||
- Assessment may involve the coordinated use of physical, psychological, and environmental procedures.
|
||
|
||
### 1.5. Psychological Assessments are
|
||
|
||
- Reliable
|
||
- Valid
|
||
- Standardized
|
||
|
||
## 2. Assessment of the Physical Conditions
|
||
|
||
### 2.1. General physical examination
|
||
|
||
Many psychological problems have physical components either as
|
||
|
||
- Causal factors
|
||
- Symptom patterns
|
||
|
||
### 2.2. Neurological examination
|
||
|
||
- **EEG:** graphical record of brain’s electrical activity
|
||
- **CAT scan & MRI:** images of brain structures that may be damaged or diseased
|
||
- **PET scan:** metabolic activity of specific compounds
|
||
- **fMRI:** mapping psychological activity to specific regions in the brain
|
||
|
||
### 2.3. Neuro-psychological examination
|
||
|
||
- Involves use of expanding array of testing devices
|
||
- Measures cognitive, perceptual, and motor performance
|
||
- Provides clues to extent and location of brain damage
|
||
|
||
**Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Battery (HRNB) (10 tests in total):**
|
||
|
||
- **Halstead Category Test:** Learn & remember
|
||
- **Tactual Performance Test**: Motor function, response, tactile & kinesthetic cues
|
||
- **Rhythm Test:** Attention, sustained concentration
|
||
- **Speech Sounds Perception Test:** Identify spoken words
|
||
- **Finger Oscillation Task:** Speed
|
||
|
||
## 3. Psychosocial Assessment
|
||
|
||
### 3.1. Assessment Interviews
|
||
|
||
- Face-to-face interaction
|
||
- Structured interviews
|
||
- Unstructured interviews
|
||
|
||
### 3.2. Clinical Observation of Behavior
|
||
|
||
- Clinical observation in natural environments
|
||
- Clinical observations in therapeutic or medical settings
|
||
- Self-monitoring
|
||
|
||
### 3.3. Psychological Tests
|
||
|
||
#### 3.3.1. Intelligence tests
|
||
|
||
- WISC-IV(children); WAISIV (adults)
|
||
- Stanford-Binet
|
||
|
||
#### 3.3.2. Personality tests
|
||
|
||
##### 3.3.2.1. Projective personality tests
|
||
|
||
- Unstructured stimuli are presented
|
||
- Meaning or structure projected onto stimuli
|
||
- Projections reveal hidden motives
|
||
|
||
**Projective personality tests examples:**
|
||
|
||
- Rorschach Inkblot Test
|
||
- Thematic Apperception Test (TAT)
|
||
- Sentence Completion Test
|
||
|
||
##### 3.3.2.2. Objective personality tests
|
||
|
||
Examples: NEO-PI, MMPI-2
|
||
|
||
Objective personality tests offer several advantages, such as standardization, efficiency, and ease of administration, but also have limitations, including limited depth, potential response distortion, and cultural bias.
|
||
|
||
## 4. The Integration of Assessment Data
|
||
|
||
- Developing integrated, coherent working model
|
||
- Utilizing individual or team approach
|
||
- Identifying definitive picture vs. discrepancie
|
||
|
||
### 4.1. Ethical Issues in Assessment
|
||
|
||
- Potential cultural bias
|
||
- Theoretical orientation of clinician
|
||
- Underemphasis on external situation
|
||
- Insufficient validation
|
||
- Inaccurate data or premature evaluation
|
||
|
||
## 5. Classifying Abnormal Behavior
|
||
|
||
- Classification involves attempts to delineate meaningful sub-varieties of maladaptive behavior.
|
||
- Classification makes it possible to communicate about particular clusters of abnormal behavior in agreed-on and relatively precise ways.
|
||
- Classification of some kind is a necessary first step toward introducing order into our discussion of the nature, causes, and treatment of such behavior.
|
||
- Classification enables the clarification of insurance issues.
|
||
|
||
### 5.1. Differing Models of Classification
|
||
|
||
Three basic approaches include:
|
||
|
||
- Categorical approach:
|
||
a patient is healthy or disordered, but there is no overlap
|
||
- Dimensional approach:
|
||
the patient may fall along a range from superior functioning
|
||
to absolutely impaired functioning
|
||
- Prototypal approach:
|
||
a conceptual entity depicts an idealized combination of
|
||
characteristics, some of which the patient may not have
|
||
|
||
### 5.2. Formal Diagnostic Classification of Mental Disorders
|
||
|
||
- Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5)
|
||
- International Classification of Disease (ICD-10)
|
||
|
||
#### 5.2.1. Definition criteria based on:
|
||
|
||
- Symptoms (subjective)
|
||
- Signs (objective)
|
||
|
||
#### 5.2.2. The DSM-5
|
||
|
||
- More comprehensive and more subtypes of disorders
|
||
- Allows for gender related differences in diagnosis
|
||
- Provides structured interview regarding cultural influences
|
||
|
||
#### 5.2.3. Problem of diagnostic labeling
|
||
|
||
- Allows label capturing more than a behavioral pattern
|
||
- Creates assumptions among clinicians
|
||
- Creates social identity (stigma)
|
||
|
||
#### 5.2.4. Diagnostic Interviews
|
||
|
||
- Unstructured:
|
||
- Freewheeling
|
||
- Clinician can follow leads
|
||
- Clinical picture may vary, based on interviewer
|
||
- Structured
|
||
- Controlled
|
||
- Determine if symptoms fit diagnostic criteria |