doc: M Associate Degree/CCLC2204 Literary Appreciation/Poetry.md BSc(Hons) Psychology/PSYC10460 Applying Psychology to Wicked Problems/PSYC10460 Week 1 Lecture 1.md Social Psychology/Aggression.md Social Psychology/Altruism.md Social Psychology/Attitudes.md Social Psychology/Behaviors in Group.md Social Psychology/Chinese Social Psychology.md Social Psychology/Compliance, Conformity, and Obedience.md Social Psychology/History of Social Psychology.md Social Psychology/Interpersonal Attraction.md Social Psychology/Introduction & Research Methods.md Social Psychology/Persuasion.md Social Psychology/Prejudice.md Social Psychology/Social Cognition.md Social Psychology/Social perception.md, R Associate Degree/CCLC2204 Literary Appreciation/Short Story.md, D BSc(Hons) Psychology/PSYC11411 Individual Differences in Mental Health and Wellbeing/Week 2.md, A Developmental Psychology/Theories of Development.md Research Method/Research Ethics.md Research Method/Research in Developmental Psychology.md
47 lines
2.7 KiB
Markdown
47 lines
2.7 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
UoM: PSYC10211 Introduction to Developmental Psychology
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 1. Naturalistic Observation
|
|
|
|
Naturalistic observation is a research method where researchers observe and record behavior in natural settings without any intervention or manipulation.
|
|
|
|
**Strengths:**
|
|
- **Good ecological validity** - Observations occur in real-world settings
|
|
- **Similar to "real-life"** - Behavior is studied in its natural context
|
|
- **Can be used to study a range of behavior** - Versatile method applicable to various behaviors and settings
|
|
|
|
**Limitations:**
|
|
- **Hard to identify causal relationships** - With so many variables present, it's difficult to determine which ones specifically influence the behavior of interest
|
|
- **Painstaking to administer** - Many behaviors occur only occasionally in everyday environments, reducing researchers' opportunities to study them through this method
|
|
## 2. Interviews
|
|
|
|
**Strengths:**
|
|
- **Allows full focus on the individual's behavioral pattern** - Provides in-depth understanding of individual cases
|
|
- **Follow-up questions can clarify earlier responses** - Enables deeper exploration and clarification of ambiguous responses
|
|
- *Example:*
|
|
- Experimenter: When Freddy said "Oh great!", did he mean it was nice or nasty?
|
|
- Child: Nasty.
|
|
- Experimenter: How do you know that?
|
|
|
|
**Limitations:**
|
|
- **Can be difficult to generalize beyond the individual case** - Findings may not be representative of broader populations
|
|
- **Can be difficult to generate a causal argument** - Limited ability to establish cause-and-effect relationships
|
|
- **Accuracy concerns** - Potential issues with recall bias, social desirability bias, or misinterpretation of responses
|
|
|
|
## 3. Experiments
|
|
|
|
The experimental method involves systematically changing one or more factors (independent variables) to determine whether these changes affect one or more other factors (dependent variables).
|
|
|
|
**Strengths:**
|
|
- **Can directly test relationships between variables** - Allows researchers to establish cause-and-effect relationships
|
|
- **Experimental control is relatively easy** - Researchers can manipulate independent variables and control extraneous variables
|
|
- **High internal validity** - Ensures that nothing besides the independent variable can affect the dependent variable
|
|
- **Random assignment** - Participants have equal chance of being exposed to each level of the independent variables
|
|
|
|
**Limitations:**
|
|
- **"Artificial" technique** - May lack ecological validity unless using naturalistic experiments
|
|
- **Sometimes not possible due to ethical issues** - Certain manipulations may be unethical to implement
|
|
- **Practical constraints** - Some research questions cannot be tested experimentally
|
|
- **External validity concerns** - Results may not generalize to other situations and people
|